Three things to think about in regards to Coronavirus

Photo by Fusion Medical Animation on Unsplash

Political Corona

Corona is a political issue. There’s no other way to explain how so many people with little background in microbiology, virology, or medicine have so much to say about it. CoVid-19 is a medical issue, and unsurprisingly, we have little knowledge of what it means. Indeed, while people with medical expertise are busy saving lives, finding a vaccine or a cure, politicians and pundits seem to be taking over our screens. They offer speculations and predictions regarding the development of the epidemic and its effects on political life. Corona is political in every aspect we can imagine. It is political in the way governments choose to respond and the way civilians decide to follow instructions. It is political in raising ideological resentment about health care, about democracy, about social responsibility and solidarity. And most of all, it is political because politicians know that their political career depends on their response to potential voters’ needs. Politicians are suffering from extreme conceptual shortage to address the challenges CoVid-19 poses. So, we hear them using the concepts of war to describe the situation. I cannot even remember the number of times I have heard slogans as: ‘we need to defeat the virus’, ‘winning the battle against an invisible enemy’, ‘we’re at war’, etc. Using such political terminology is a way to demonstrate political control over a non-political threat to mitigate social anxiety of the unknown.

What about Globalization?

Photo by Nicole Geri on Unsplash

On the verge of an Ethical Bankruptcy

Moral uncertainty is perhaps the least addressed topic in the context of the global crisis. While our entire value system has been disrupted to confront the virus spread, little has been said about the value reorganization we are experiencing. In the blink of an eye, humanity has forfeited freedom of movement and its right to privacy. We have been told that our children pose a life threat to our parents, we were asked to remain confined in our homes and jeopardize our source of income for public health and security. Criticism against these measures has been met with public outrage and condemnation. A reality that was unthinkable just about three months ago. The rapid shift from putting human liberty and dignity at the top of the ladder, to placing it at the bottom, is a moral shock. Such rapid transformations are likely to jeopardize any political or financial system. It is only reasonable that it would endanger a moral system as well. What was considered laudable and praiseworthy, is now condemnable and blameworthy. The value of social cohesion has been replaced with social isolation. Family proximity as a source of resilience, is now depicted as a source of danger. Individualism has been embraced for the sake of public well-being instead of for individual well-being. It is still early to determine how long this situation would persist and the impact it will have on our social life. Nevertheless, the reorganization of moral values might devastate our social anchors, which is much more dangerous than any financial crisis we might face.



Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Adi Levy

Adi Levy


Ph.D. Visiting lecturer at the University of Haifa. Fascinated by the ethical questions of political science and trying to make sense of society and morality